Sample output - no signup, no form

The review a synced folder sends you each morning

This is a real PlanOps Project Document Review, with the project details anonymised - the actual output the assistant produces from the documents that sync from SharePoint. Same structure, same detail, same drawing-level references you get on your own project.

Greenfield Primary

Project Document Review

Project
Greenfield Primary
Documents reviewed
3 (2 drawings, 1 photo)
Review period
Last five days
Generated by
PlanOps

Executive summary

  • Two revisions of the hard landscape plan (Sheet 02) for Greenfield Primary and one site progress photograph have arrived in the last five days.
  • The P02 revision adds new hatched zones, annotations and feature detailing in the central play area and lower hardstanding that carry moderate-to-high cost and coordination implications; the photograph confirms external works are advancing around a near-complete building with roof solar panels.
  • Headline implications include potential re-pricing of hardstanding and play-area elements, coordination of no-dig construction with arboricultural and engineering requirements, and confirmation that external paving and street-furniture installation are progressing on site.
  • Total documents: 3 (2 drawings, 1 photo); the set is dominated by landscape and civil coordination information for the school project.

What these documents mean for the project

The P02 hard landscape plan (and its P01 predecessor) defines the proposed external surface finishes, kerb types, retaining walls, street furniture, signage, utilities interfaces and no-dig construction zones across the school site. It directly affects the landscape, civil engineering, drainage and external works packages, as well as coordination with the structural engineer (retaining walls, manholes, EV charging) and the arboricultural consultant (tree root-space volumes and no-dig methodology). The drawing unlocks setting-out and procurement of permeable and non-permeable asphalt, feature paving, wetpour safety surfaces, sensory paths, bollards, benches, cycle stands, willow structures, canopies and signage, while highlighting dependencies on the engineer's drawings for lighting, drainage and services.

The site photograph shows a near-complete building with brick walls, a red metal roof and extensive roof-mounted solar panels, together with newly installed paving, parking bays and timber edge protection. It confirms external works are underway and the building envelope is substantially complete, letting the team cross-check actual progress against the hard landscape plan and identify any emerging discrepancies in levels, finishes or protection measures.

What's changed (revisions & comparisons)

The automated comparison between P01 and P02 of drawing GFP-HLB-ZZ-ZZ-D-L-30002 shows several material updates concentrated in the central play area and lower-left hardstanding:

  • New or expanded blue hatched rectangular zones added over the lower-left hardstanding and within the central play area - additional hardstanding or setting-out detail not present in P01.

    70% difference50% cost impact
  • New blue hatched and gridded rectangles around the right-side feature area and the central dashed rectangle - likely additional feature or play-equipment bases.

    60% difference40% cost impact
  • Multiple new text annotations and general notes added in the central play area.

    50% difference10% cost impact
  • Adjustments to the number and position of the red square markers along the top path and within the play area.

    30-40% difference10-20% cost impact

These changes warrant re-coordination with the cost plan, the arboricultural method statement and the engineer's details for any affected drainage or root-space provisions. No other drawings were revised in the period.

Recommended actions

  1. 1Landscape and cost teams to review the new blue hatched zones in P02 for quantity and specification changes, and confirm any cost or programme impact within five working days.
  2. 2Civil and structural engineer to confirm the additional hatched areas remain compatible with the referenced no-dig methodology and tree root-space requirements.
  3. 3Site team to use the photograph to verify installed paving and parking bays align with the P02 layout, and to raise any discrepancies via RFI.
  4. 4Confirm receipt of the soft landscape details sheet (GFP-HLB-ZZ-ZZ-D-L-450023) referenced on the hard landscape plan.

Document register

The set comprises two revisions of a single hard landscape drawing plus one progress photograph. No referenced drawings (such as the soft landscape details or the engineer's service drawings) appear in the current upload; the team should check whether these have been issued under separate references.

Document inventory - 3 found

#TitleTypeRevStatusUploaded
1Hard Landscape Plan Sheet 02GFP-HLB-ZZ-ZZ-D-L-30002-HARD LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 02-.pdfDrawingP02Accepted8 Jul 2026
2Hard Landscape Plan Sheet 02GFP-HLB-ZZ-ZZ-D-L-30002-HARD LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 02- (1).pdfDrawingP01Accepted8 Jul 2026
3Site progress photo7 Nos Cycling Hoops Installed.jpgPhotoN/AAccepted8 Jul 2026

Important

This report was generated with AI assistance. It is a decision-support aid, not a substitute for professional judgement. Review all findings against the source documents and have a competent person verify anything you rely on. The accuracy of this output depends on the documents and data supplied.

Download the full review (PDF)

Keep it to share with a colleague - no email needed.

Get one of these from your own folder

Connect the SharePoint site you already run and PlanOps reviews what syncs - every working morning. Start free with 50 IU credits, about a fortnight of reviews. Your files in SharePoint are never moved or modified.

Start free - no card